Sentimental Value: The House That Remembers Us

article 13 header

I always believed I carried no sentimental value. Places, objects, even homes; I thought I could leave them behind without consequence. My life felt lighter that way, unburdened by attachment. But then I met my wife, who treasures the smallest objects, the quietest corners, the places that hold memory. Through her, I began to see that I too carry sentimental value; maybe not in objects, but definitely in places.

Watching 6 Days earlier this year, the Egyptian film that showed the streets of my childhood, I felt the weight of places I had left behind. A street corner where I once waited for friends, a cinema where I first tasted independence, a building whose walls still echo with my laughter. Suddenly, memory was not abstract. It was visceral. It was mine. I realized that places hold us even when we think we’ve let them go.

So when Sentimental Value begins with Nora imagining herself as the house she grew up in; wondering what the walls remember of arguments, laughter, silence, I felt an immediate resonance. The house as witness, the house as vessel of memory.

Sisters in Shadow

Nora and Agnes grew up in a fractured home. Their father Gustav, once a celebrated filmmaker, was absent, consumed by his career. He believed that if he looked away from art, even for a moment, it would vanish. And so he chose art over family.

The sisters carried this absence differently. Nora, a stage actress, mirrored her grandmother’s despair. She admitted that what she showed the world was only 20% of her truth; the rest was chaos, depression, silence. Agnes, by contrast, built a family. She married, had a son, and found stability. Yet her survival was not simply resilience; it was Nora. Nora filled the void their parents left, giving Agnes the safety she needed to endure. But Nora herself had no one to fill her own void.

Who fills the spaces left in us? And who do we unknowingly fill for others?

article 13 image 1
Sentimental Value (2025) is written and directed by Joachim Trier, co-written by Eskil Vogt, and starring Renate Reinsve, Stellan Skarsgård, and Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas

Gustav’s Reckoning

Late in life, Gustav faced the wreckage of his choices. He tried to mend through the only language he knew: art. He wrote an autobiographical screenplay about his mother’s trauma and her suicide in the family home. He wanted Nora to star in it. That was his way of extending a hand, of saying what words could not.

But art cannot erase absence. It cannot undo years of neglect. It can only expose the fractures and ask if healing is still possible.

Do we sometimes use our work as a substitute for love, hoping it will speak where we cannot?

My Own Mirror

This film unsettled me because Gustav’s story is not only his. It is ours.

I see myself in his hunger; the restless pursuit of career, the fear that if I look away, even for a moment, it will vanish. I know the temptation to chase success until it consumes everything else. And I know the quiet terror of wondering what I am leaving behind in that chase.

I ask myself daily: Am I making the right choice? Am I choosing what will last, or what will fade?

Because success glitters. It convinces us that it defines who we are. But what are we losing in its glow?

That question is not only mine; it is embedded in the film’s very form. Joachim Trier’s direction refuses to rescue us with easy answers. His camera lingers in silence, holding on faces long after words have stopped. That silence felt like my own; the pauses in my life where I cannot speak, where presence itself must carry the weight. The film’s rhythm mirrors the rhythm of memory: uneven, fractured, full of gaps.

Renate Reinsve’s performance as Nora is devastating not because of what she says, but because of what she cannot say. Her restraint, her silences, her half-smiles; they reminded me of the ways I too hide, the ways I show only fragments of myself. Stellan Skarsgård as Gustav embodies the exhaustion of a man who has lived too long in pursuit of art, and too little in pursuit of love. Watching him, I wondered if I am rehearsing the same role; living too long in pursuit of work, too little in pursuit of presence.

And that thought does not belong only to me. It belongs to all of us who chase careers, who leave behind fragments of love, of presence, of memory. We forget the quiet rooms that once held our laughter. We forget the people who waited for us to come home.

And when the pursuit ends, will we recognize ourselves in what remains?

Will our houses remember presence, or absence?

Will our children remember warmth, or distance?

Will our partners remember love, or distraction?

Will we remember who we were before we started running?

These questions linger in me like an echo in a room. And when I turn inward, I think of my own house; the walls that have heard my silences, the rooms that have seen me distracted, the corners where joy once lingered. What will they carry forward when I am gone? Will they speak of a man who was present, or a man who was elsewhere?

Generations echo through us. Gustav’s grandmother, Gustav himself, Nora, Agnes; each one caught between art and absence, between memory and forgetting. And I wonder if I am repeating their story, or if I can break it.

The film doesn’t answer these questions. It only asks them. And maybe that’s enough.

What will our houses remember of us? The laughter, the arguments, the silences? Will they remember presence, or absence? And when memory speaks, will it tell us we chose well?